Decisions at REINVIO are made within documented institutional rules and boundaries. These rules exist prior to execution and are not adjusted in response to situational pressure or convenience.

Where considerations intersect, authority defaults to the Learning Architecture, developmental alignment principles, and stated non-negotiables. Individual preference, urgency, or external expectation does not override these constraints.

This structure exists to ensure consistency over time and to prevent improvisation in learning-critical decisions.

Learning-related evaluation is grounded in observable evidence rather than comparative or numerical signals.

Evidence concerns what a learner can explain, apply, and sustain across contexts. Single demonstrations or isolated responses are treated as partial indicators, not confirmations of learning.

Evaluation operates within established evidence standards and institutional boundaries.

Technology operates under defined institutional limits. Its role is restricted to supporting observation, organisation, and reflection within learning processes.

Interpretation of understanding, readiness, and progression is not delegated. Responsibility for learning-critical judgment remains human and accountable.

Technology does not define, accelerate, or replace learning decisions.

REINVIO maintains an internal responsibility to examine its decisions, assumptions, and patterns of action.

Review exists to identify misalignment with stated principles before it becomes embedded. Correction is prioritised over preservation of precedent or convenience.

This process functions as an internal obligation, not a mechanism of validation.